
Note the “50 ohm” rating printed on the jacket of the cable. What will an ohmmeter register when connected between the inner conductor and shield of the cable? What will an ohmmeter register when connected between opposite ends of either the inner conductor or the shield, from one end of the cable to the other?
Resistance between inner conductor and shield = (infinite)
Resistance between ends of inner conductor = nearly 0 ohms
Resistance between ends of shield conductor = nearly 0 ohms
It would be a great idea to have some samples of RG58/U (or other coaxial cable type) available in your laboratory for students to measure themselves. There is nothing like direct, handson experimentation to make a point!
If a battery and switch were connected to one end of a 10mile long cable, and two oscilloscopes were used to record voltage at either end of the cable, how far apart in time would those two pulses be, assuming a propagation velocity equal to the speed of light (in other words, the cable has a velocity factor equal to 1.0)?

53.68 microseconds
Students should realize by the wording of the question that the voltage signal probably does not arrive at the far end of the cable instantaneously after the switch is closed. Although the speed of light is very, very fast, it is not instant: there will be a measurable time delay.
If a battery and switch were connected to one end of a 10mile long cable, and two oscilloscopes were used to record voltage at either end of the cable, how far apart in time would those two pulses be, assuming a propagation velocity equal to 69% the speed of light (in other words, the cable has a velocity factor equal to 0.69)?

77.80 microseconds
Students should realize by the wording of the question that the voltage signal probably does not arrive at the far end of the cable instantaneously after the switch is closed. Although 69% of the speed of light is still very, very fast, it is not instant: there will be a measurable time delay.
What does the “50 ohm” rating of an RG58/U coaxial cable represent? Explain how a simple cable, with no continuity between its two conductors, could possibly be rated in ohms.
Hint: this “50 ohm” rating is commonly referred to as the characteristic impedance of the cable. Another term for this parameter is surge impedance, which I think is more descriptive.
A cable with a characteristic, or surge, impedance of 50 ohms behaves as a 50ohm resistor to any voltage surges impressed at either end, at least until the surge has had enough time to propagate down the cable’s full length and back again.
This concept will seem very strange to students who are only familiar with resistance in the context of resistors and other simple electrical components, where resistance does not change appreciably over time. In this example, though, the “resistance” of the cable is extremely timedependent, and the time spans involved are typically very short  so short that measurements made with ohmmeters will not reveal it at all!
Given the following test circuit, with an oscilloscope used to record current from the battery to the cable (measuring voltage dropped across a shunt resistor), what sort of waveform or pulse would the oscilloscope register after switch closure?

The oscilloscope would register a squareedged pulse of voltage approximately equal to 480 μV, which of course corresponds to a current of approximately 480 mA:

The pulse duration should range somewhere between 162.67 microseconds and 170.42 microseconds (based on two different figures I obtained for RG58/U cable velocity factors).
Answering this question requires several steps, and the combining of multiple concepts. It should be apparent from the answer that Ohm’s Law (I = ^{E}/_{R}) is sufficient for calculating pulse current, but the time delay figure given in the answer may confuse some students. For those students who calculate a time figure that is half as much as the one given in the answer, encourage them to think of why their (incorrect) answer might have been off by 50%. The existence of a 2:1 ratio such as this implies a simple conceptual misunderstanding.
For the RG58/U cable velocity factor, I obtained two different figures: 0.63 and 0.66, which accounts for the two time delay answers given.
Given the following test circuit, with an oscilloscope used to record current from the battery to the cable (measuring voltage dropped across a shunt resistor), what sort of waveform or pulse would the oscilloscope register after switch closure?

The oscilloscope would register a continuous current of 480 mA any time the switch is closed.
Challenge your students to think of another electrical component (besides an RG58/U cable of infinite length) that would behave like this, drawing 480 mA of current from a 24 volt source any time the switch is closed. Hint: you don’t have to think very hard!
Suppose this 10milelong RG58/U cable were “terminated” by a resistor with a resistance equal to the cable’s own characteristic impedance:

What sort of waveform or pulse would the oscilloscope register after switch closure?
The oscilloscope would register a continuous current of 480 mA any time the switch is closed.
Ask your students to compare the behavior of this circuit with that of an unterminated RG58/U cable. How does this circuit’s behavior differ? Why is that?
To phrase the question in a different way, what does the inclusion of a terminating resistor do to the apparent length of the cable? In other words, what length of RG58/U cable would behave exactly the same as this circuit?
When a pulse propagates down an “unterminated” cable and reaches an opencircuit, what does it do? Does it simply vanish, or does it go some place else?
A voltage pulse, upon reaching the open end of a cable, will be “reflected” back in the direction from which it came, its polarity being maintained while the current moves in the opposite direction.

After the reflected pulse reaches the source, there will be maximum voltage at the source terminals and zero current in the cable.
To help answer this question, it is helpful to ask students how voltage and current relate to each other in an opencircuit condition (maximum voltage, zero current).
When a pulse propagates down a cable terminated by a shortcircuit, what does it do? Does it simply vanish, or does it go some place else?
A voltage pulse, upon reaching the shorted end of a cable, will be “reflected” back in the direction from which it came, its polarity being reversed while the current moves in the same direction.

After the reflected pulse reaches the source, there will be minimum voltage at the source terminals and maximum current in the cable.
To help answer this question, it is helpful to ask students how voltage and current relate to each other in a shortcircuit condition (minimum voltage, maximum current).
What will happen if a cable is terminated by a resistor of incorrect value (not equal to the cable’s characteristic impedance)?
Any terminating resistance not equal to the cable’s characteristic resistance (either too small or too large) will result in reflected waves, albeit at lesser amplitude than if the cable were either unterminated or terminated by a direct short.
Answering this question is an exercise in qualitative thinking: compare the results of termination with the proper amount of resistance, versus termination with infinite or zero resistance. A terminating resistor of improper value will produce an effect somewhere between these extreme cases.
For instance, compare the cable impedance (as “seen” by the voltage source after a substantial amount of time) for a properly terminated cable, versus one that is either openended or shorted. What would a cable terminated by an impropervalue resistor “look” like to the source after the propagation delay time has passed?
A twoconductor cable of uniform construction will exhibit a uniform characteristic impedance (Z_{0}) due to its intrinsic, distributed inductance and capacitance:

What would happen to the value of this characteristic impedance if we were to make the cable narrower, so that the conductors were closer together, all other dimensions remaining the same?

Z_{0} would decrease. I will leave it to you to explain why this happens.
Be sure to ask your students to explain why the characteristic impedance will change in the direction it does, based on the known changes to both capacitance and inductance throughout the cable. It should fairly simple for students to explain why capacitance will increase as the two conductors are brought closer together, but it may not be as apparent why the inductance will decrease. A good “Socratic” question to ask is about magnetic field strength, assuming one end of the cable were shorted, and a DC current source connected to the other end. Be sure to remind them to discuss the righthand corkscrew rule for current and magnetic fields in their answer to this followup question!
A twoconductor cable of uniform construction will exhibit a uniform characteristic impedance (Z_{0}) due to its intrinsic, distributed inductance and capacitance:

What would happen to the value of this characteristic impedance if we were to make the cable wider, so that the conductors were further apart, all other dimensions remaining the same?

Z_{0} would increase. I will leave it to you to explain why this happens.
Be sure to ask your students to explain why the characteristic impedance will change in the direction it does, based on the known changes to both capacitance and inductance throughout the cable. It should fairly simple for students to explain why capacitance will increase as the two conductors are brought closer together, but it may not be as apparent why the inductance will decrease. A good “Socratic” question to ask is about magnetic field strength, assuming one end of the cable were shorted, and a DC current source connected to the other end. Be sure to remind them to discuss the righthand corkscrew rule for current and magnetic fields in their answer to this followup question!
A twoconductor cable of uniform construction will exhibit a uniform characteristic impedance (Z_{0}) due to its intrinsic, distributed inductance and capacitance:

What would happen to the value of this characteristic impedance if we were to shorten the cable’s length, all other dimensions remaining the same?

Z_{0} would remain exactly the same!
Followup question: what electrical characteristics would change for this shortened cable?
This is sort of a “trick” question, designed to make students think about characteristic impedance, and to test their real comprehension of it. If a student properly understands the physics resulting in characteristic impedance, they will realize length has nothing whatsoever to do with it. Although the cable’s total capacitance will change as a result of shortening the cable’s length, and the cable’s total inductance will likewise decrease for the same reason, these electrical changes should not present a conceptual difficulty to students unless they are modeling the cable in terms of one lumped capacitance and one (or two) lumped inductance(s). If they are thinking in these terms, they have not yet fully grasped the reason why characteristic impedance exists at all.
Suppose we were designing a pair of BJT amplifier circuits to connect to either end of a long twoconductor cable:

How would we choose the component values in each transistor amplifier circuit to naturally terminate both ends of the 75 Ω cable?
R_{C} of the transmitting amplifier should be 75 Ω, as should the parallel equivalent resistance R_{B1}  R_{B2} of the receiving amplifier.
This question is really a review of Thévenin’s theorem as it applies to commonemitter, dividerbiased BJT amplifier circuits.
In case anyone asks, the “zigzags” in the four lines for the cable represent an unspecified distance between those points. In other words, the cable is longer than what may be proportionately represented on the schematic diagram.
Suppose we were designing a pair of BJT amplifier circuits to connect to either end of a long twoconductor cable, each end coupled to its respective amplifier through a transformer:

How would we choose the component values in each transistor amplifier circuit to naturally terminate both ends of the 75 Ω cable?
R_{C} of the transmitting amplifier should be 1.875 kΩ, as should the parallel equivalent resistance R_{B1}  R_{B2} of the receiving amplifier.
This question is really a review of Thévenin’s theorem as it applies to commonemitter, dividerbiased BJT amplifier circuits, and also impedance transformation as it applies to stepup and stepdown transformers.
In case anyone asks, the “zigzags” in the four lines for the cable represent an unspecified distance between those points. In other words, the cable is longer than what may be proportionately represented on the schematic diagram.
Some communications networks use cables to not only provide a path for data transmission, but also DC power to energize the circuits connected to the cable.

However, if we were to terminate the cable as shown, the termination resistor would dissipate a substantial amount of power. This is wasted energy, and would unnecessarily burden the power supply providing DC power to the network cable.
How can we eliminate the problem of power dissipated by the termination resistor in a DC power/signal cable and yet still maintain proper termination to avoid reflected signals?
A capacitor must be connected in series with the termination resistance to prevent the resistance from acting as a DC load on the network:

Understanding this answer requires that students recall the filtering behavior of a series capacitor in an AC circuit.
Find a length of coaxial cable and bring it with you to class for discussion. Identify as much information as you can about your piece of cable prior to discussion:
If possible, find a manufacturer’s datasheet for your components (or at least a datasheet for a similar component) to discuss with your classmates.
The purpose of this question is to get students to kinesthetically interact with the subject matter. It may seem silly to have students engage in a “show and tell” exercise, but I have found that activities such as this greatly help some students. For those learners who are kinesthetic in nature, it is a great help to actually touch real components while they’re learning about their function. Of course, this question also provides an excellent opportunity for them to practice interpreting component markings, use a multimeter, access datasheets, etc.
Published under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License
by Nilo Mitra
by Gary Elinoff
by Robert Keim