News

Molybdenum Disulfide Transistors Could Be the Next Leap in Microelectronics

February 13, 2017 by Robin Mitchell

A team of researchers from Stanford have created transistors from molybdenum disulphide using standard industrial-type production techniques. Will silicon finally be replaced once transistors cannot be made any smaller using silicon?

A team of researchers from Stanford have created transistors from molybdenum disulphide using standard industrial-type production techniques. Will silicon finally be replaced once transistors cannot be made any smaller using silicon?

A Small Problem, A Big Impact

It has been said so many times now and it will be said yet again here–silicon is reaching its limits! Engineers have been able to design more powerful products every 18 months thanks to the semiconductor industry being able to reduce the size of transistors. When a transistor is reduced in size, it allows for more transistors to fit on a single chip which in turn allows for more complex circuits to be built.

One classic example is the effect on CPUs when transistor counts are doubled. The first CPU, the Intel 4004, had only 2300 transistors where the next CPU, the 8008, had 3500 transistors and nearly had twice the capability (8-bits over 4-bits, faster clock, and larger memory model). So it is clear that increasing transistor count makes ICs better, so why are engineers worried about future development of silicon devices?

 

Intel 4004 helped to revolutionize the planet. Image courtesy of Thomas Nguyen [CC BY-SA 4.0]

 

The size of the latest transistors (as of 2017) is 10nm, which makes transistor features on the order of tens of atoms in size. Such small devices become harder to produce as making such feature sizes relies on more advanced equipment which comes at a cost.

But the problem with small transistors does not end there. When transistor gates become very small (atoms across), quantum effects–which are normally insignificant such as electron tunneling–become apparent and can have detrimental effects.

Take electron tunneling, for instance: If the gate becomes too thin and electrons can tunnel through then charge stored on the gate can be lost which requires the user to replace that lost charge. The result is a transistor that consumes more current which in turn results in more heat dissipation. Individual transistors (even if very leaky) have near immeasurable amounts of current loss and temperature rise but when several billion devices are placed on a single piece of silicon, the effect adds up and becomes a serious problem. But current does not just leak from the gate; current can tunnel from the source to the drain if the two are in close proximity which can impede a transistors ability to control current.  

Enter Molybdenum Disulphide

So how can devices become smaller? There are many ideas being developed by many engineers and researchers alike, including the use of diamond, graphene, and even organic compounds.

Recently, a team from Stanford created a 1nm transistor using molybdenum disulfide but is difficult to produce. This work was further advanced by researchers at the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting in December who created working complex circuits using realistic manufacturing techniques.

However, a group (also from Stanford) demonstrated how 10nm devices can readily be produced using molybdenum disulfide. But what makes the devices made by Stanford impressive is how they were produced and their exhibited characteristics which could make them much faster than silicon-based devices.

 

MoS2 devices. Image courtesy of Stanford University.

 

Read More

 

According to the Stanford researchers, when molybdenum disulfide transistors are on the scale of 10nm, electrons moving between the drain and source begin to exhibit ballistic conduction, which is when electrons stop scattering as they move through the material. This scattering is what causes resistivity in materials—without it, a material essentially has 0 resistance.

Therefore, electrons in molybdenum disulfide transistors could pass through unaffected by the semiconducting material and hence could operate much faster compared to their silicon counterparts. Eric Pop (an EE at Stanford) estimates that one in five electrons undergo ballistic conduction in the 10nm devices. However, Eric Pop believes that, if the quality of the semiconductor material is improved and the transistor reduced in size, this ballistic conduction number will increase. This would result in higher-speed devices which can conduct more current without heating up as much as a silicon device.

The devices, however, are not just small and fast. They could be easily manufactured using similar techniques to silicon devices. Silicon chips are so successful due to their ability to be produced on massive scales using layered techniques whereby each layer is either added or subtracted from a single wafer of silicon (and each wafer can produce hundreds of devices).

Stanford researchers were able to produce the 10nm devices by taking a silicon wafer and growing molybdenum disulfide on top. Then, a gate was grown on top of the semiconductor by first depositing 20nm of aluminum and then allowing it to oxide (where it shrinks to 10nm).

Summary

Silicon is rapidly reaching its limits yet customer demand for power is constantly increasing. It won’t be long before a new material needs to step in and provide the much-needed processing power. Molybdenum disulphide devices show much promise in the field of nanometer scale devices but whether they become the semiconductor of the future remains unclear.

4 Comments
  • R
    Romsha February 14, 2017

    If everything is so good with molybednum sulphide then whats the catch?

    Like. Reply
    • lugazz February 14, 2017
      Whole semiconductor industry is based upon silicon, and it's an easily obtainable material. The transition to another material, such as molybdenum, would require such a huge effort that makes it not worth it, at least for now. And if industry decides to use molybdenum, those new transistors / ICs will have to be compatible with silicon-based ones that are already in market.
      Like. Reply
  • User8192 February 17, 2017

    This article needs some serious copy-editing for punctuation.

    Like. Reply