Basic Electricity
Basic Troubleshooting Strategies
15 questions By Tony R. Kuphaldt
-
Question 4 of 15
A new residential neighborhood is being built, and you are working as a member of the construction crew. One day, when the heating technicians are on-site doing checks of the gas furnaces in each new house, they report that the last house in the neighborhood does not have natural gas. The piping is installed, of course, but when they turn the gas valve on nothing comes out.
The gas pipeline servicing these houses is laid out in the following manner:

Each black dot on the diagram is a shutoff valve, used for isolating different sections of the service pipeline. Based on the heating technician’s report, you conclude that the service pipeline going up to that house must not be “live,” and that one of the numbered valves was probably left in the off position. But which one could it be?
You know that the main utility connection at the street is “live,” because the gas heater in the contractor mobile building is working just fine. You decide to go to valve #8 and check for gas pressure at that point in the pipeline with a portable pressure gauge, then checking the pressure at each valve location down the pipeline until you find where there is good gas pressure. However, before you step out of the room to go do this, one of your co-workers suggests you start your search at the middle point of the pipeline instead: at the location of valve #4.
Explain why your co-worker’s idea is better, and also what your next step would be if: (a) you did find pressure at that point, and (b) if you did not find pressure at that point.
Reveal answerYour co-worker’s strategy is based on the principle of dividing the gas pipeline into halves, and checking for pressure at the half-way point. This troubleshooting strategy is sometimes referred to as the “divide-and-conquer” method, because it divides the system into small sections to optimize troubleshooting time and effort.
Notes:This problem gives students a chance to explore the “divide and conquer” strategy of troubleshooting in a context that is very simple and does not require knowledge of electricity.
-
Question 5 of 15
As a technician, you are sent to troubleshoot a complex piece of electronic equipment that has stopped working. Upon opening the cabinet door for this equipment, your nose is greeted by the pungent odor of burnt circuit board (a smell you are unlikely to forget, once having experienced it). What does this simple fact indicate (or possibly indicate) about the nature of the equipment’s fault?
Reveal answerThe fact that you can smell trouble indicates you are most likely dealing with a catastrophic failure caused by (or resulting in) excessive current. When components have been heated to such a degree that they emit strong odors, the damage is often visible as well, which makes it easier to locate problem areas.
Follow-up question: upon further investigation, you locate the charred remains of an electronic component, located on one of the system’s circuit boards. Is this the only fault, being that it is the only component visibly damaged? Explain why or why not.
Notes:It is important for students to understand that not all faults become visible, even if catastrophic!
Be sure to discuss with your students that the burnt component may very well be a victim of another component failure, and not the cause of the system fault. For instance, shorted wiring located far from the equipment enclosure may have caused the components to destruct. This is a common assumption made by beginning troubleshooters: that the most obvious failure is the only failure, or that it must be the primary failure.
-
Question 6 of 15
Two computer technicians are called to troubleshoot malfunctioning computer systems. Although the symptoms in each system are very similar, the histories of the two systems are not. The first computer is a unit that has been in operation for over two years, while the second system is a brand-new prototype, still in the developmental stages.
Without knowing any more details on these two computer systems, what recommendations can you give to the two technicians about to troubleshoot them? If you were asked to troubleshoot each system, how would you approach the two systems differently? What ranges of problems might you expect from each system?
Reveal answerI’ll let you determine the answers to this question! I do not expect that you will provide specific, technical answers, because I have given very little information about the malfunctioning systems. What I want is for you to think in general terms: how might the scope of possible problems differ between any two similar systems, one of which is proven while the other is untried?
Notes:As an illustration of this principle, you might want to elaborate on your own experiences as an electronics instructor. When assisting students with lab projects, what typical problems do you encounter with the circuits they build, and how do these problems typically differ from problems you’ve seen in real-life electronic equipment?

I have a question about troubleshooting.
As a technician you were asked to troubleshoot a pieces of electronic equipment which contains various electronic components . On opening the door of the cabinet, you perceived a pungent smell and in addition you observed the following:
1. There were some dirt and corrosion on the circuit board
2. One of the capacitor was discolored.
3. One of the leads of the transistor was broken..
Please I need an urgent answer please….