Typically, complex circuits are not arranged in nice, neat, clean schematic diagrams for us to follow. They are often drawn in such a way that makes it difficult to follow which components are in series and which are in parallel with each other. The purpose of this section is to show you a method useful for redrawing circuit schematics in a neat and orderly fashion. Like the stage-reduction strategy for solving series-parallel combination circuits, it is a method easier demonstrated than described.
Let’s start with the following (convoluted) circuit diagram. Perhaps this diagram was originally drawn this way by a technician or engineer. Perhaps it was sketched as someone traced the wires and connections of a real circuit. In any case, here it is in all its ugliness:
With electric circuits and circuit diagrams, the length and routing of wire connecting components in a circuit matters little. (Actually, in some AC circuits it becomes critical, and very long wire lengths can contribute unwanted resistance to both AC and DC circuits, but in most cases wire length is irrelevant.) What this means for us is that we can lengthen, shrink, and/or bend connecting wires without affecting the operation of our circuit.
The strategy I have found easiest to apply is to start by tracing the current from one terminal of the battery around to the other terminal, following the loop of components closest to the battery and ignoring all other wires and components for the time being. While tracing the path of the loop, mark each resistor with the appropriate polarity for voltage drop.
In this case, I’ll begin my tracing of this circuit at the positive terminal of the battery and finish at the negative terminal, in the same general direction as current would flow. When tracing this direction, I will mark each resistor with positive polarity on the entering side and negative polarity on the exiting side, for that is how the actual polarity will be as current (according to the conventional-flow model) enters and exits a resistor:
Any components encountered along this short loop are drawn vertically in order:
Now, proceed to trace any loops of components connected around components that were just traced. In this case, there’s a loop around R_{1} formed by R_{2}, and another loop around R_{3} formed by R_{4}:
Tracing those loops, I draw R_{2} and R_{4} in parallel with R_{1} and R_{3} (respectively) on the vertical diagram. Noting the polarity of voltage drops across R_{3} and R_{1}, I mark R_{4} and R_{2} likewise:
Now we have a circuit that is very easily understood and analyzed. In this case, it is identical to the four-resistor series-parallel configuration we examined earlier in the chapter.
Let’s look at another example, even uglier than the one before:
The first loop I’ll trace is from the negative (-) side of the battery, through R_{6}, through R_{1}, and back to the positive (+) end of the battery:
Re-drawing vertically and keeping track of voltage drop polarities along the way, our equivalent circuit starts out looking like this:
Next, we can proceed to follow the next loop around one of the traced resistors (R_{6}), in this case, the loop formed by R_{5} and R_{7}. As before, we start at the positive end of R_{6} and proceed to the negative end of R_{6}, marking voltage drop polarities across R_{5} and R_{7} as we go:
Now we add the R_{5}—R_{7} loop to the vertical drawing. Notice how the voltage drop polarities across R_{7} and R_{5} correspond with that of R_{6}, and how this is the same as what we found tracing R_{7} and R_{5} in the original circuit:
We repeat the process again, identifying and tracing another loop around an already-traced resistor. In this case, the R_{3}—R_{4} loop around R_{5} looks like a good loop to trace next:
Adding the R_{3}—R_{4} loop to the vertical drawing, marking the correct polarities as well:
With only one remaining resistor left to trace, then next step is obvious: trace the loop formed by R_{2} around R_{3}:
Adding R_{2} to the vertical drawing, and we’re finished! The result is a diagram that’s very easy to understand compared to the original:
This simplified layout greatly eases the task of determining where to start and how to proceed in reducing the circuit down to a single equivalent (total) resistance. Notice how the circuit has been re-drawn, all we have to do is start from the right-hand side and work our way left, reducing simple-series and simple-parallel resistor combinations one group at a time until we’re done.
In this particular case, we would start with the simple parallel combination of R_{2} and R_{3}, reducing it to a single resistance. Then, we would take that equivalent resistance (R_{2}//R_{3}) and the one in series with it (R_{4}), reducing them to another equivalent resistance (R_{2}//R_{3}—R_{4}). Next, we would proceed to calculate the parallel equivalent of that resistance (R_{2}//R_{3}—R_{4}) with R_{5}, then in series with R_{7}, then in parallel with R_{6}, then in series with R_{1} to give us a grand total resistance for the circuit as a whole.
From there we could calculate total current from total voltage and total resistance (I=E/R), then “expand” the circuit back into its original form one stage at a time, distributing the appropriate values of voltage and current to the resistances as we go.
REVIEW:
RELATED WORKSHEETS:
by Luke James
In Partnership with Eaton Electronic Components
by Gary Elinoff
by Robert Keim