Potentiometer as a Rheostat
Chapter 3 - DC Circuits
- Rheostat use
- Wiring a potentiometer as a rheostat
- Simple motor speed control
- Use of voltmeter over ammeter to verify a continuous circuit
Parts and Materials
- 6-volt battery
- Potentiometer, single turn, 5 kΩ, linear taper (Radio Shack catalog # 271-1714)
- Small “hobby” motor, permanent-magnet type (Radio Shack catalog # 273-223 or equivalent)
For this experiment, you will need a relatively low-value potentiometer, certainly not more than 5 kΩ.
Lessons In Electric Circuits, Volume 1, chapter 2: “Ohm’s Law”
Wiring Illustration for Using a Potentiometer as a Rheostat
Instructions for Potentiometer Wiring
Potentiometers find their most sophisticated application as voltage dividers, where shaft position determines a specific voltage division ratio. However, there are applications where we don’t necessarily need a variable voltage divider, but merely a variable resistor: a two-terminal device. Technically, a variable resistor is known as a rheostat, but potentiometers can be made to function as rheostats quite easily.
In its simplest configuration, a potentiometer may be used as a rheostat by simply using the wiper terminal and one of the other terminals, the third terminal left unconnected and unused:
Moving the potentiometer control in the direction that brings the wiper closest to the other used terminal results in a lower resistance. The direction of motion required to increase or decrease resistance may be changed by using a different set of terminals:
Be careful, though, that you don’t use the two outer terminals, as this will result in no change in resistance as the potentiometer shaft is turned. In other words, it will no longer function as a variable resistance:
Build the circuit as shown in the schematic and illustration, using just two terminals on the potentiometer, and see how motor speed may be controlled by adjusting shaft position. Experiment with different terminal connections on the potentiometer, noting the changes in motor speed control. If your potentiometer has a high resistance (as measured between the two outer terminals), the motor might not move at all until the wiper is brought very close to the connected outer terminal.
As you can see, motor speed may be made variable using a series-connected rheostat to change total circuit resistance and limit total current. This simple method of motor speed control, however, is inefficient, as it results in substantial amounts of power being dissipated (wasted) by the rheostat. A much more efficient means of motor control relies on fast “pulsing” of power to the motor, using a high-speed switching device such as a transistor. A similar method of power control is used in household light “dimmer” switches. Unfortunately, these techniques are much too sophisticated to explore at this point in the experiments.
When a potentiometer is used as a rheostat, the “unused” terminal is often connected to the wiper terminal, like this:
At first, this seems rather pointless, as it has no impact on resistance control. You may verify this fact for yourself by inserting another wire in your circuit and comparing motor behavior before and after the change:
If the potentiometer is in good working order, this additional wire makes no difference whatsoever. However, if the wiper ever loses contact with the resistive strip inside the potentiometer, this connection ensures the circuit does not completely open: that there will still be a resistive path for current through the motor. In some applications, this may be an important. Old potentiometers tend to suffer from intermittent losses of contact between the wiper and the resistive strip, and if a circuit cannot tolerate the complete loss of continuity (infinite resistance) created by this condition, that “extra” wire provides a measure of protection by maintaining circuit continuity.
You may simulate such a wiper contact “failure” by disconnecting the potentiometer’s middle terminal from the terminal strip, measuring voltage across the motor to ensure there is still power getting to it, however small:
Using Motor Voltage is a Safer Alternative to Measuring Circuit Current
It would have been valid to measure circuit current instead of motor voltage to verify a completed circuit, but this is a safer method because it does not involve breaking the circuit to insert an ammeter in series. Whenever an ammeter is used, there is risk of causing a short circuit by connecting it across a substantial voltage source, possibly resulting in instrument damage or personal injury. Voltmeters lack this inherent safety risk, and so whenever a voltage measurement may be made instead of a current measurement to verify the same thing, it is the wiser choice.
Published under the terms and conditions of the Design Science License